Everyone today is talking about technology and its impact on people. The impact on people could be from different perspectives. Let us examine it from the angle of impacting life and living.
I grew up in an era where the computer was not around nor the television in homes. Both these appeared in our offices and homes post the eighties in most countries and homes. How have they changed our lives ? Our quality of life has improved materially and physically although may have deteriorated emotionally ?
I remember many unions especially in banks were worried about introduction of computers and had resisted it for some time. Today a bank cannot imagine its existence without computers. We as customers do most of our banking ourselves on computers or mobiles. Has it impacted bank employees ? I would say it has helped the bank employees to improve the quality of their work and their productivity.
I believe the impact of technology will be similar in the future as well. Technology may develop more rapidly in the future than in the past. The quality of our lives and living may improve further. However, the same technology may be helpful if we are willing to use it prudently.
Let us examine the impact of technology on employees from a Human Resources perspective across the employee’s life cycle process – from recruitment to retirement. Technology may help in screening and assessing candidates more objectively and much faster. But I cannot imagine whether even artificial intelligence will ever be able to substitute human judgement in the future.
While it is true that a “Alexa” or IBM Watson may be able to derive logic from tons of data available to them but still may not be able to beat human judgement. It is like the development of technology, which brings the best of cameras in the world every day but none of them have been able to beat the human eye as a camera in its capacity and delivery.
We could trust computers and artificial intelligence to help in addressing routine tasks and also developing them in employees. However, the ability to respond intuitively like a human being may not be a reality in the near future. Even today the Alexa and Watson depend on inputs from human beings and programmers to derive logic from data fed into them.
Now, if we move to assessing and motivating employees, we need to examine the impact of technology. Technology can help us in objective performance assessment but the ability to empathise may not be replicable like a human being. I am aware of robots performing all types of tasks including love making but all of it will be without any emotions.
Similarly technology may help in making more precise decisions including in exits. However, human judgement is a combination of logic and gut. Logic can be built in by technology but not the gut. Most of the times in our lives, our decisions are based on gut and not by logic.
I believe technology will change life for the better in the future. But, no technology can substitute human emotions. We need to use technology for improving our quality of life without getting impacted on our emotions. Today, we are willing to embrace technology and are increasingly losing the human touch.
Its like technology enables you to take a beautiful selfie without much effort as in the photo above. However, if we end up getting drowned in the sea taking a selfie on the beach, whom should we blame ?
Let technology lead us to a better tomorrow and we continue to trust human relationships to improve both technology and ourselves.
S Ramesh Shankar
16th May 2018
Thanks sir for picking up a topic which is time relevant and also needs a serious look as regards it’s effectiveness as the use of technology in the HR area continues to rise. While I do agree with you that the emotional aspect of human interaction can never be truly replaced by the most advanced robot, the technology juggernaut should be let free to roll over any application areas in its natural flow instead of creating any preconceived apprehension about the same. Even in banking industry where applications of IT has major dominance, the Bankers have appreciated the need of in-person human interaction and that’s why you have relationship manager, grievance cells and other service executives taking care of the customer’s emotional demands. I am hopeful that the same balancing act should be done by the HR managers as well with a greater degree of human interfacing in this 21st century HR systematics. Thanks for sharing your insights on this important subject. 🙏
LikeLiked by 1 person
True Kabir
LikeLike